Megan: Last News

+8

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ‘ruined’ Charles’ first year as King by ‘cashing in’ on royal name: expert

first anniversary of his May 6 coronation on Monday, following 12 months of several challenges and health woes plaguing the United Kingdom’s royal family.But according to royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams, the most testing times for the Firm were caused by none other than the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.In fact, Fitzwilliams believes that Harry and his wife “retaliated” after being evicted from Frogmore Cottage — a royal residence they thought would “always be there for them.”“The facts simply are with Harry and Megan that after ‘Spare,’ enough was enough, so he had them evicted from Frogmore Cottage, and I don’t think they expected it,” the royal guru told the Sun.“And they certainly didn’t like it. But the revelations in ‘Spare,’ and not only the attacks on the royal family in that book and in the interviews surrounding it, which large numbers of people watched, of course, that Harry was responsible for, and it was his memoir.”Fitzwilliams said that while Harry’s bombshell memoir was released in January last year, it’s pearl-clutching revelations still managed to have an impact on the king’s reign.” ‘Spare’ was so badly planned, you felt that he’d not had advice, but to attack Queen Camilla was clearly a red line, as was pointed out by the press that he’s so hostile to,” he told the outlet.
nypost.com

All news where Megan is mentioned

nypost.com
77%
127
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle ‘ruined’ Charles’ first year as King by ‘cashing in’ on royal name: expert
first anniversary of his May 6 coronation on Monday, following 12 months of several challenges and health woes plaguing the United Kingdom’s royal family.But according to royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams, the most testing times for the Firm were caused by none other than the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.In fact, Fitzwilliams believes that Harry and his wife “retaliated” after being evicted from Frogmore Cottage — a royal residence they thought would “always be there for them.”“The facts simply are with Harry and Megan that after ‘Spare,’ enough was enough, so he had them evicted from Frogmore Cottage, and I don’t think they expected it,” the royal guru told the Sun.“And they certainly didn’t like it. But the revelations in ‘Spare,’ and not only the attacks on the royal family in that book and in the interviews surrounding it, which large numbers of people watched, of course, that Harry was responsible for, and it was his memoir.”Fitzwilliams said that while Harry’s bombshell memoir was released in January last year, it’s pearl-clutching revelations still managed to have an impact on the king’s reign.” ‘Spare’ was so badly planned, you felt that he’d not had advice, but to attack Queen Camilla was clearly a red line, as was pointed out by the press that he’s so hostile to,” he told the outlet.
dailystar.co.uk
48%
915
Royal Family 'very concerned' about Prince Harry publishing new book
Prince Harry will still go ahead with publishing his memoir and the Palace is “understandably very concerned”.Katie Nicholl, Vanity Fair’s royal correspondent, who was featured on Portillo on GB News explained: “We know from the things that Harry and Megan have said in Oprah and in other interviews that they're not afraid to criticise the institution…“I mean, my experience of books is that he's been paid something like a 35-million-pound advance, half of which has already been paid.“I know the Palace is understandably very concerned about what's going to be in this book.”Early reports suggested that Harry would “tone down” his book in respect of how grandmother.READ MORE:Palace aides are 'plotting to stop Prince Harry's bombshell book from being released'However, Nicholl said she believes that this won’t be the case at all.“We know from the things that Harry and Megan have said in Oprah and in other interviews that they're not afraid to criticise the institution.“They're not afraid to have a pop at members of the Royal Family.”She continued by saying she doesn’t believe that his is “going to hand back half of that advance and pull the plug on the book.”Another royal commentator, Charles Rae, urged the prince not to publish the tell-all.He said, “Harry is supposed to be doing some changes so they can tone it down a bit.“Well, I've got one change for Harry: he should scrap it.“Just don't publish it, Harry.
express.co.uk
92%
239
England 'is where he belongs': Sharon Osbourne felt 'sad' seeing Harry at Queen's funeral
Sharon Osbourne, 69, has admitted she got emotional during the Queen's state funeral held on September 19, especially after seeing Prince Harry.The Talk host admitted it was touching to see the Duke of Sussex back in England after he and his wife Meghan Markle quit royal duties in 2020.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have embarked on a new life in Montecito, California with son Archie, three, and one-year-old daughter Lilibet.The nation bid a final farewell to Britain and the Commonwealth's longest reigning monarch, who died on September 8.People lined the streets to catch a glimpse of the procession — the small, thoughtful details, like the Queens's corgis and horse waiting for her casket at Windsor Castle, were "magnificent", said Sharon but still emotional for the presenter.Ozzy Osbourne's wife — who gave commentary to Fox News during the funeral broadcast - reacted to Harry and Megan reunited with the rest of the royals.In a new interview, she admitted feeling "sad" for the Duke of Sussex."I felt really, really sad for Harry when he came back," she admitted to Yahoo! Entertainment."And I felt sad, sad for the country because it's — it's where he belongs.To see him walking with his father and his brother, I just felt very, very sad."Sharon went on to share her hopes for the brothers in the future hoping their recent facetime could lead to a reconciliation."I think it would be amazing," she added.
DMCA