Subway for fraud, intentional misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and other claims under US law. Shalini Dogra, who leads the legal team bringing the complaint, claims that Subway’s tuna is “a mixture of various concoctions that do not constitute tuna, yet have been blended together by defendants to imitate the appearance of tuna". “We found that the ingredients were not tuna and not fish,” the lawyer said in an email to The Washington Post.
The complainants have yet to reveal what they think the "tuna" actually is.A spokesperson for Subway UK & Ireland spokesperson told the Daily Star: “There simply is no truth to the allegations in the complaint that was filed in California.
Read more on dailystar.co.uk