Rugby Football League, who launched an investigation before charging Chisholm with using “discriminatory language and conduct”.And despite there being no evidence to support the allegation, the halfback was found guilty at a tribunal hearing.Chisholm, 31, who strenuously denied ever saying the derogatory comment, has launched an appeal against the ban, which would rule him out of the first two months of the new Championship season if upheld.The ban has left the club seething and chief executive Martin Vickers has accused the RFL of having an agenda against them.He said: “There was absolutely no corroborating evidence to support the allegation.Want to be on the ball with all of the latest football news?Well then sign up for the brilliant.
Read more on dailystar.co.uk