cancel culture: Last News

+2

All news where cancel culture is mentioned

express.co.uk
79%
697
'Can't say anything anymore!' Peter Kay blasts cancel culture amid tour tickets backlash
Peter Kay, 49, has lamented the “backlash” caused by "cancel culture" nowadays when he appeared on The Zoe Ball Breakfast Show yesterday.The star’s comments on BBC Radio 2 come as fans continue to take to Twitter today to complain about difficulties with booking tickets for his upcoming tour. Peter and Zoe, 51, were co-presenting her BBC show following the comedian’s exciting announcement that he would be going on tour after 12 years of absence from the stand-up scene. Ever the funnyman, Peter played a game with Zoe which involved listening out for commonly misheard lyrics in songs.One song that the pair played for Radio 2 listeners was You Get What You Give by New Radicals.The lead singer Gregg Alexander can be heard singing the lyric “what’s real can’t die”. However, Peter pointed out that the “can’t die” sounded remarkably similar to the name of Liverpudlian comedian Sir Ken Dodd.“Hang on, it’s coming up now - Ken Dodd,” Peter said in time with the music, as Zoe burst out laughing. “It goes on for ages! He must be a fan of Ken Dodd, he just shouts it out randomly,” Peter joked.“It’s so true! Like the Diddymen,” Zoe said in reference to the mythical race made famous by comedic legend Ken. The Diddymen have existed in Merseyside mythology for years and refer to a miniature race of people.While they started as an unseen joke, the characters eventually went on to appear onstage with the comedian, and were played by either children or adults with dwarfism.“Oh, you can’t say that now,” Peter told Zoe about the reference, “No, it’s not allowed.” “Oh, is it not?” Zoe said in a hushed tone. “No,” Peter reiterated as the song continued to play.“Can’t say anything!” Peter said.
express.co.uk
42%
707
Sharon Osbourne lists 'three things' she'll never talk about after being cancelled
Speaking to DailyMailTV, Sharon said: "I learned a lot through [getting canceled] but you are who you are."I am not a racist … never said one racist thing."People are woke, it's a whole different world out there. People conduct themselves differently now."It came after Sharon was attacked on The Talk for defending Piers Morgan after the star had left Good Morning Britain over his controversial views on Meghan Markle. Sharon's defense of Piers on the live show did not sit well with her The Talk co-host Sheryl Underwood.The star added when speaking about her entanglements with Sheryl, that words can easily be "distorted".She said: "It's scary when you can say one thing and it gets distorted or people don't understand the context."The wife of rocker Ozzy Osbourne maintained she would not talk about certain things again as you "just can't win".Sharon and Ozzy have recently announced their decision to return to the UK after having lived in the US. It comes after Ozzy was diagnosed with Parkinson's but Sharon said it "wasn't the reason" the couple wanted to return home. The pair insisted the real reason was due to the rise in violent crime across America. Ozzy said, speaking to The Observer: "Everything’s f***ing ridiculous there.
express.co.uk
68%
943
Graham Norton fumes he's not a 'f**king moral arbiter' after JK Rowling interview backlash
Harry Potter author's new novel which involves the topic and theme of cancel culture, among other things. The pair spoke on his show last month, and the decision was met with some scorn by fans and critics of the author. It comes after she came under fire, initially in June 2020, for controversial tweets she had posted about the transgender community. Her stance has caused fans and Harry Potter film stars, such as Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint to speak out against her. In a new conversation with The Times, Graham has defended his decision to interview the polarising writer amid the contention.He said it would feel "wrong" to not interview someone purely because he disagrees with their views.Graham reiterated that it seems "just as bad" to not speak to someone because of their views as the fact that it will "annoy some people."The TV host said: "Am I suddenly the f**king moral arbiter of the world who says who can be on TV or can’t? No.“People will be on my show and I’ll laugh with them and that will annoy some people, but not having them on seems just as bad.”He did say however, that it would have been easier to simply "not have her on", but explained it didn't "seem right". Graham added: “[I] wouldn’t have her on to air her views, [but] she has the right to still wang on about her crime novel."The easiest thing would be to not have her on, but that didn’t seem right.”After the interview was first announced, other guests Lucy Moss and Toby Marlow pulled out of their appearances on Graham's radio show.The pair explained they didn't "feel comfortable" being on the same billing as JK Rowling, according to Huff Post. JK also addressed speculation that the reason she didn't attend the recent Harry Potter
express.co.uk
40%
551
'Too thin-skinned!' Ulrika Jonsson shares her fears as ‘workplace banter’ complaints soar
The Sun that perhaps she is simply "desperate for human company".However, cancel culture, combined with compensation lawsuits, seem to have made many people anxious about laughing and joking in case their intentions are misinterpreted.Ulrika made it clear she's firmly against racism or homophobia, however, she believes that some of the other jokes might have been taken too seriously.She also added she believed that most "right-minded" people knew when to draw the line and what the difference was between a light-hearted jibe and an inappropriate and offensive one.Ulrika, who has also admitted to mixed feelings about the "neutrality" of her home country, Sweden, has nonetheless caused offence online herself recently.In a separate Sun column earlier in the year, she had commented on a hospital trust in Brighton and Sussex which suggested to midwives they could "refer to mothers as birthing parents and the act of breastfeeding as chest-feeding”.The new terminology had been adopted in a bid to make trans or non-binary parents feel more included.However, Ulrika challenged: "Why can I not enjoy being called a mother? I don’t want to be a ‘birthing parent’."She added: "Why does traditional terminology always have to incite negative connotations?"At what point am I allowed to stand up and say my breasts are called breasts because that is what they biologically and organically are?”The comment caused offence among some members of the transgender community.However Ulrika insists she is not transphobic, and merely feels proud to be female.Pink News also commented that "birthing people" was being used as an additional term, alongside the conventional label of "mother", instead of replacing it.After claiming she had been a victim of

Popular Questions Regarding cancel culture

What is cancel culture and why is it important?

Cancel culture is a highly searched subject that attracts attention. On our website, we regularly publish articles covering this topic.

Where can I find the latest updates about cancel culture?

All breaking news on cancel culture can be found in our dedicated section. We update information in real time.

How can I verify the accuracy of information about cancel culture?

We consult experts to ensure that all information related to cancel culture is accurate and useful for our readers.

What are the most talked-about moments related to cancel culture?

From viral moments to social media trends, cancel culture has been involved in events that captivated audiences around the world.

Where can I read a full biography of cancel culture?

You can explore a detailed biography of cancel culture in our dedicated section, which includes key facts and verified background information.

DMCA