Emma Stone Yorgos Lanthimos Bella Baxter film relationships social actress man Emma Stone Yorgos Lanthimos Bella Baxter

Emma Stone responds to suggestions that ‘Poor Things’ is “sexist and exploitative”

Reading now: 583

Emma Stone has responded to critics of her film Poor Things, who have suggested that the film is sexist and exploitative.The recent Oscar-nominated film sees the actress play Bella Baxter, a dead woman brought back to life by a mad scientist in Victorian London after having the brain of an unborn baby put in her head, before going on a journey of sexual discovery.However, some have criticised the film, suggesting that it presents consent issues considering Bella has the brain of a child, while the fact that it is directed by a man – Yorgos Lanthimos – could suggest it is sexist.Speaking to The Times, Stone said: “If it helps, as the person who played it and produced it, I didn’t see her as a child in any of those scenes.”“But even that’s too literal,” Lanthimos added. “If you take a film that literally, where you start discussing it in terms of the brain of a child, then you’re kind of missing the point of storytelling in general.

If you start to analyse the film as something that would actually happen, then of course the film doesn’t work.”Stone went on to reflect on films being criticised in the social media age, revealing: “My mum has this saying that at the start of a relationship you say, ‘Oh we’re so in love we finish each other’s sentences.’ And then, as time goes by, it becomes, ‘You’re always interrupting me.’“That can happen in a relationship with film, too, especially a film like this, that’s asking more questions than giving answers.

I know people who’ve seen the film and think it’s just the sweetest romantic comedy, and others who had to watch it through their fingers.

Read more on nme.com
The website celebsbar.com is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.

Related News