CELEBRITY LAWSUITS: Last News

appearing on Adam22’s No Jumper podcast Monday with Wack 100 and Lush One.Adam asked Cannon, “How did you avoid those parties?” to which Nick replied, “I leave early.” Wack told the group that at a “Diddy party, in the house it was still cool til, like, 2:30-3. After that, cats leave.

claims in a new lawsuit, according to reports.West’s former personal assistant, OnlyFans star Lauren Pisciotta, also said in the filing in Los Angeles court that the 48-year-old rapper raped and drugged her at a party hosted by Sean “Diddy” Combs.The 86-page filing details new allegations against West, including an apparent obsession with wanting to sleep with his partner’s mother, the outlet said. Pisciotta, who also was chief of staff for West’s Yeezy brand from 2021 to 2022, claims the rapper showed her text messages between himself and Censori, 29, saying he wanted to have sex with her mother.

was accused of raping a woman in her lawsuit filed last week. In turn, Brooks filed a complaint with the District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Northern Division on Tuesday where he named his accuser and sued her for compensatory and punitive damages, according to court documents obtained by The Post.Brooks said in the docs he wants “compensatory damages” caused by his accuser’s “intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and false light invasion of privacy.”The accuser’s legal team released a statement after her name was included in Brooks’ filing.“Garth Brooks just revealed his true self.

obtained by CNN. The suit alleges these incidents happened in 2019. “We are confident that Brooks will be held accountable for his actions,” attorneys Douglas H.

Prime Video series that filmed over the summer.In a redacted version of the lawsuit, the contestants said they are seeking a jury trial to determine monetary damages “likely totaling in the millions of dollars.”The five plaintiffs claimed they were subjected “to unreasonable, unsafe, and unlawful employment conditions.”The complaints listed in the lawsuit include sexual harassment, failure to prevent harassment, negligent infliction of emotional distress, failure to provide uninterrupted meal breaks, failure to provide uninterrupted rest breaks, failure to pay minimum wages, failure to pay overtime, false advertising, unfair business practices and more.The lawsuit specifically claimed that the show — which allegedly has a $100 million budget — misrepresented itself by telling contestants there would be 1,000 participates, only for them to find out “upon arrival” that there were more.This “reduced” the contestants’ chances of winning the purported $5 million grand prize, the suit said.The complaint also alleged that MrBeast (whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson) “did not want to use the alleged unconstrained resources” that he had for the show “to provide fair wages, or even bare-minimum-legal working conditions.”Instead, MrBeast and the defendants allegedly “employed superior bargaining power to coerce the contestants to sign unconscionable contracts with illegal terms and illusory obligations,” per the suit.The defendants were specifically blamed for having “created, permitted to exist, and fostered a culture and pattern and practice of sexual harassment including in the form of a hostile work environment.”The Post has reached out to MrBeast’s rep for comment.Attorneys for the five anonymous people who filed the lawsuit

“Flowers.”The Post obtained the lawsuit, which was filed by Tempo Music Investments in a Los Angeles court Monday. Mars, 38, is not a plaintiff in the lawsuit.

ITV’s Rebecca Barry as part of the network’s new documentary titled “Tabloids on Trial.”“But that’s a hard question to answer, because anything I say about my family results in a torrent of abuse from the press,” he added.The new hour-long documentary focuses on the 2011 phone hacking scandal, as well as the multiple lawsuits Harry has brought forward against publishers in recent years.“I’ve made it very clear that this is something that needs to be done, it would be nice if we did it as a family,” the father of two said. “I believe that from a service standpoint and when you’re in a public role, these are the things that we should be doing for the greater good.

sued four of her ex-business associates, including Brigitte Kruse, last week. She claimed they stole over $1 million from her and accused them of financial elder abuse.

she tried to burn down her Manhattan apartment in 2019 to land a gig on “The Real Housewives of New York.”Abitbol denied this and responded by suing Rice for defamation.However, in a decision on July 9, a New York County Supreme Court judge dismissed the case and ruled that Abitbol, 52, must pay all of Rice’s legal fees.“There is ample evidence of Plaintiff attempting to gain notoriety from the fire by talking about it on talk shows and publicizing the fire on her Instagram,” a ruling seen by The Post stated.“Plaintiff was also featured in a New York Page Six article just three months prior to the fire as being someone who was ‘obsessed’ with getting on ‘Real Housewives of New York’ and had apparently failed four auditions.”As Abitbol previously told The Post, on the morning of Nov. 9, 2019, she lit a sage candle for morning meditation in the dining room of her and Cone’s four-bedroom apartment in Lincoln Square.As she said her prayers, Abitbol explained, the candle went up in flames, setting off the building’s sprinklers.The NYPD and FDNY were called “immediately” to the incident, which was later ruled an accident, Abitbol said.

obtained by TMZ, the ex-wife of late crooner Elvis Presley has slapped four ex-business associates with a suit including 12 different complaints on Thursday.Presley, who is represented by attorney to the stars Marty Singer, claimed that Brigitte Kruse, Kevin Fialko, Vahe Sislyan and Lynn Walker Wright all planned to “drain her of every last penny she had.”Presley, 79, claims that the foursome “meticulously planned” a scheme against “an older woman by gaining her trust, isolating her from the most important people in her life, and duping her into believing that they would take care of her.”The lawsuit, which is also filed against Priscilla Presley Partners, LLC, further alleged that Kruse, Fialko, Sislyan and Walker Wright planned to take control of her finances.Presley claims they did so by “forcing her into a form of indentured servitude” after which they would “receive the lion’s share of any revenue that she was able to earn in the future.”Presley specifically singled out Kruse — whom she met in 2021 — in the suit by calling her a “con artist and pathological liar,” and adding that Fialko, “misappropriated, [embezzled] and converted” more than $1 million from her.

The Associated Press.Henley maintained the 100 pages were stolen from him, and vowed to pursue legal action in March when his criminal case against three men attempting to sell the developmental lyrics was dropped by a New York court.“These 100 pages of personal lyric sheets belong to Mr. Henley and his family, and he has never authorized defendants or anyone else to peddle them for profit,” Henley’s lawyer, Daniel Petrocelli, said.Glenn Horowitz, Craig Inciardi and Edward Kosinski, were initially charged with conspiracy in the fourth degree for allegedly attempting to sell manuscripts which included “developmental lyrics to the Eagles song ‘Hotel California,'” according to the original indictment filed by the New York District Attorney’s office in 2022.The handwritten pages remain in the custody of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office, according to the new lawsuit.In March, prosecutors dropped the criminal case mid-trial citing newly available emails that defense lawyers said raised questions about the trial’s fairness.

LA Times.The lawsuit, filed with the LA County Superior Court by the victim’s daughter, Ashley Sanchez, claims the guitarist had “thrown and/or dragged” her father “across the asphalt” upon impact, where “he sustained blunt force trauma to the head, and lay on the pavement until medical transport arrived.”Video of the alleged accident, obtained by TMZ, shows the black SUV making a left turn at the intersection of West Main Street and Meridian Avenue in Alhambra, Cali. — a neighborhood of Los Angeles — and then striking Sanchez.

Beastie Boys are suing the owner of Chili’s for using their song “Sabotage” in social media ads.The hip-hop and rock group filed a complaint in Manhattan federal court accusing Chili’s owner Brinker of copyright infringement and unfair competition from using significant portions of the 1994 track without a license.“Use of the ‘Sabotage’ sound recording, music composition and video was all without permission,” the group’s attorneys wrote in the lawsuit on Wednesday, obtained by the Post. “The plaintiffs do not license ‘Sabotage’ or any of their other intellectual property for third-party product advertising purposes, and deceased Beastie Boys member Adam Yauch included a provision in his will prohibiting such uses.”Yauch’s estate, Michael Diamond and Adam Horovitz are all listed as plaintiffs in the suit.

obtained by People show.“At the time of Michael Jackson’s death, Michael Jackson’s most significant assets were subject to more than $500 million of debt and creditors’ claims, with some of the debt accruing interest at extremely high interest rates, and some debt in default,” the filing said.Before his death, Jackson had been in the middle of preparing for his “This Is It” residency, which added some strain on his finances.He died on June 25, 2009 — close to the tour’s inception — which left his estate financially liable for $40 million to the tour promoter, AEG.The petition requests that money from the “Smooth Criminal” hitmaker’s estate be used for reimbursement stemming from 2018.The reimbursement includes “legal, negotiating and various other operating expenses,” per the filing.Jackson had “more than half a dozen lawsuits pending worldwide” at the time of his death, the petition reads.“The Executors were able to renegotiate and restructure financing arrangements that existed at the time of Michael’s death, at substantially reduced interest rates, enabling the Estate to avoid the loss of any assets to the lenders and ultimately to satisfy the encumbrances that existed at the time of Michael’s death,” court documents read.From July to December 2018, several firms are seeking over $3.5 million in legal fees for services rendered during that time.“Although the Executors have eliminated the Estate’s debt, have resolved virtually all of the creditors’ claims and litigation, and have successfully solidified the MJJ business as a significant entity in the music industry, there remain challenging business, tax and legal issues that the Executors and their counsel continue to deal with,” the filing reads.“The Executors have

was awarded $180,700 in December after London’s High Court ruled he had been the victim of “modest” phone-hacking and other unlawful information gathering by journalists on British newspapers.But now, more than six months after the ruling, an attorney for the publisher of the British tabloid has accused Harry of engaging in “shocking” and “extraordinary” obfuscation.Attorney Anthony Hudson said at High Court that Harry had deliberately destroyed text messages with the ghostwriter who penned his bombshell memoir, “Spare,” released in Jan. 2023.The Duke’s lawyer has denied the claims, saying News Group Newspapers was engaging in a “classic fishing expedition” by requesting documents so late in the case.“NGN’s tactical and sluggish approach to disclosure wholly undermines the deliberately sensational assertion that the claimant [Harry] has not properly carried out the disclosure exercise,” Harry’s attorney, David Sherborne, said in court papers.

Page Six.Pisciotta reportedly claims in the lawsuit filed June 3 that West owes her $3 million in severance, as well as an additional $1 million that he allegedly promised her for deleting her OnlyFans account.Per Page Six, she worked for West in 2021 and 2022 and was paid an annual wage of $1 million “to be at his beck and call 24/7.”The lawsuit also features alleged text messages that West sent to Pisciotta about his sex life. One message reportedly reads: “One time I took Viagra and f**ked [name removed] for three hours.

obtained by TMZ, Crystal, who was married to the Playboy magazine publisher from 2012 until his death in 2017, said Madison, 44, caused her “serious harm.”The 38-year-old claimed the comments Madison made on the “Girls Next Level” podcast last month were “malicious and intentionally misleading,” and claimed they were damaging to her reputation.During the May 12 podcast episode, Madison and her co-host Bridget Marquardt spoke to Hefner’s son Marston Hefner.Madison and Marquardt both dated the late mogul and were considered to be his “main girlfriends,” alongside Kendra Wilkinson.Among the myriad of Hefner-related topics covered, the trip discussed Crystal’s book “Only Say Good Things: Surviving Playboy and Finding Myself,” released in January.Madison implied that Crystal kept the late Playboy editor “doped up” in his final years in a bid to exploit him financially.Responding to the allegations, Crystal’s legal team told the outlet that “nothing could be further from the truth,” calling the claim “entirely false.”“As we understand it, Ms. Hefner was steadfast in her commitment to Mr.

$170 million lawsuit over the hit series.The streamer has flown show creator and star Richard Gadd and co-star Jessica Gunning over to the US from the UK for a softball-question promotional tour.The co-stars made their US morning TV debut on the “Today” show last week, when they were interviewed by Hoda Kotb and made no mention of the real-life drama that has been bubbling up behind the scenes.That same day, the two took part in a SAG-AFTRA panel. But hours later.

her complaint reads, adding, “Defendants told these lies, and never stopped, because it was a better story than the truth, and better stories made money.”Series creator and star Richard Gadd isn’t named in the suit. Harvey is alleging defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence and violations of her right of publicity.Based on events from creator-star Richard Gadd’s life, “Baby Reindeer” (now streaming, with nearly 60 million viewers tuning in for its first month) is a thriller following Donny (Gadd), a struggling comedian who meets Martha (Jessica Gunning) while he’s working as a bartender. When he shows her a moment of kindness, that backfires.

estranged wife Friday to remove an Instagram post from her account, claiming the post has severely damaged his reputation, according to a report. Brown, 45, alleges that a post on 33-year-old model Kelly Yazdi’s Instagram account violated a confidentiality agreement she had signed with him, court documents obtained by TMZ showed.The “Chicken Fried” singer is hoping a judge will prevent Yazdi from making false, harmful, or defamatory remarksThe “Colder Weather” artist is seeking emergency injunctive relief in the shape of a temporary restraining order that will force her to remove the post.The court has yet to make a ruling on the matter, the outlet added.In one of her posts on Instagram, before the lawsuit was filed, Yazdi was captured walking into a pool with a lengthy caption discussing an abusive relationship.“Projections.

decision to strip him and his family of taxpayer-funded UK security protection.The Duke of Sussex, 39, has now been ordered to pay 90% of the UK Home Office’s legal costs for defending the court’s initial ruling.In February, Sir Peter Lane, the judge of the High Court, ruled that there was no unlawfulness in stripping the Sussexes of their security in Feb. 2020.The court found that any departure from the policy was justified and that the decision was not influenced by unfairness.This now means that Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, must pay out of pocket for their family’s security when visiting the UK.On Monday, Judge Lane said Harry should pay most of the Home Office’s legal costs, but noted that the government had committed “breaches” during proceedings which were “sanctionable.”“They have resulted in the case being largely contested by reference to new grounds, which have not been subjected to the normal permission process,” he said in an official order Monday.“The breaches resulted from misapprehensions on the part of the defendant as to the duty of disclosure, which this decision has had to address at some length.