hereThey also say there is 'no evidence or justification for the prioritisation' of retail over hospitality.The plans could also have a 'potentially indirectly discriminatory effect' on young people and those from BAME backgrounds working in hospitality, the pair claim.On Twitter, Mr Lord said: "We SHOULD be able to open indoors, with measures in place, at the same time as non essential retail."I'd go further to say it's even safer."Mr Osmond added: "I believe we can show that discrimination and unsubstantiated beliefs, rather than facts, science and evidence, lie at the heart of much of the Government’s approach to hospitality, and these wrongs need to be righted."This legal case will give a fighting chance to over three million people who.
Read more on manchestereveningnews.co.uk