, or the fact that people don't like to be reminded that women are, in fact, humans with breasts, but there was a time when exposing your black bra—or any bra—for fun was considered the pinnacle of .Doing so still might elicit judgement in questionable settings (some critics thought it best to for cosmos with the girls and button up for ) but, for the most part, exposed undergarments aren't scandalous anymore but actually quite stylish, a point of view that's been cosigned by thinking-women designers like Miuccia Prada, whose Miu Miu and Prada “bra dresses” by and Scarlett Johansson.
We regularly see tiny bandeaus under sheer tops. Wearing a sports bra with no shirt has practically become a mandatory uniform for coffee runs in every city across America.
But in each of these cases, the bra is still doing its intended job. Yes, they're visible, but they're also lifting, supporting, and mostly covering what women have historically been told isn't suitable for public viewing.But recently, it seems some celebrities and influencers are tired of pretending that breasts—two mounds of fat and connective tissue—have a magical ability to defy gravity by opting for a different kind of exposed bra, one that seems to serve no purpose whatsoever other than to subtly be seen underneath an open blouse, blazer, or .
I can't decide whether to call it the pointless black bra (PBB) or the little black bra (LBB) but, honestly, it's a vibe.The pointless black bra has no aggressive underwire, no padding, barely any coverage to speak of, and seemingly has its wearers ignoring its adjustable straps.
Read more on glamour.com