Seven biggest bombshells from Prince Harry's security row - including 'mystery figure'

ok.co.uk:

When Prince Harry left his Royal role in 2020, everything changed - not least his hotly-debated security arrangements.The Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) has decided he would no longer be given the "same degree" of publicly-funded protection when in the UK.

In a bid to change his level of personal security, Harry launched a High Court challenge - but on Wednesday, February 28, a judge rejected the duke's case and concluded Ravec's approach was not irrational nor procedurally unfair - although Harry will appeal, the Mirror reports.The ruling came as part of a 52-page partially redacted document, which sheds light on Harry's case and how retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane came to his decision....

Harry's heartfelt admission In the early part of the judgement, it is noted that Harry was challenging his security arrangements following his decision not be a full time working Royal.

And in his first witness statement to the court, Harry said: "My wife and I felt forced to step back from this role and leave the country in 2020." The ruling reveals a letter between the former chair of RAVEC, Sir Richard Mottram, and the late Queen's private secretary Sir Edward Young.This letter disclosed Harry and Meghan's plans back in 2020.The judgement reads: "The letter recorded that it was understood the claimant and his wife would travel back to the United Kingdom to pursue their private charity work and that Her Majesty the Queen may from time to time invite them to attend Royal occasions in the United Kingdom in their private capacity and to participate in family events." In addition, the judgement explains why Harry believed he needed high-level security - due to his public profile and.