How Meghan Markle's Vanity Fair Cover in 2017 Mentioning Prince Harry Sparked Royal Outrage

The Queen has offered her grandson Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle an olive branch as she invited them to Balmoral over the summer. The visit could see the Duke, 37, and Duchess, 40, spend time with her majesty, 96, - who recently led tributes to her great grandson Prince George on his birthday - at her Scottish estate during the summer when other senior royals are not around.The Balmoral Estate is a favourite with Queen Elizabeth and she headed up to the Highlands on Thursday 21 July, where she plans to stay at Craigowan Lodge for the next 10 weeks.

Queen has reportedly offered Meghan Markle and Prince Harry an olive branch, inviting them to join her at Balmoral during her summer break. The opportunity would allow the Sussexes to stay with Her Majesty briefly when other senior royals aren't around, avoiding any drama.

Victoria Beckham also found herself caught up in accusations regarding a press leaking scandal - seemingly much like Coleen Rooney and Rebekah Vardy in recent times but without the court battle. In the new publication, Tom claimed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had become "addicted" to the media - with the pair constantly reading stories about themselves.

Prince Harry gave her during a wild night in Las Vegas.Carrie Reichert says the Duke of Sussex handed her the pants as a raunchy keepsake some 10 years ago when he stripped down to his crown jewels.At that time, photos of a naked Harry hugging another woman made headlines all around the world.READ MORE: Prince Harry would 'not have married Meghan' if Diana had been alive, expert claimsBritish-born Carrie, 43, says that the black undies are a reminder of the old “fun Harry” who she says is sadly now “a bore” after marrying Meghan Markle. She is also auctioning a swimsuit and a dress she wore at the time and is hoping she could net up to £800,000.Her representative said: “Harry has become such a bore, it’s a real shame.

Prince Harry "wouldn’t have married Meghan Markle" if Princess Diana was alive, The Queen’s former aide has strongly claimed. In an exclusive interview with GB News on Friday 22 July, The Queen’s former Press Secretary Dickie Arbiter also hit out at the BBC as pressure grows on them to apologise for the Martin Bashir scandal.

Royal Family members travel a lot through the country and even abroad on various royal engagements. Of course, the royals don't have to deal with any of the long processes that the rest of us have to go through, however they do have their own set of protocols that they are expected to follow. Here are six royal family travelling secrets and how the Cambridges often break one rule by travelling together.

Queen's allegedly warned just months before the ceremony that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 's marriage would "all end in tears". Lady Susan Hussey, who has been a lady-in-waiting to the Queen since the 1960s, is said to have made the comment at a lunch with a group of theatre executives, according to reports.The comments from the aide were revealed in a new book by investigative writer Tom Bower.READ MORE: WHO says world-wide monkeypox outbreak is now a global emergencyRevenge: Meghan, Harry And The War Between The Windsors was published earlier this week.Bower writes, according to the Daily Mail : "While discussing the possibility that Meghan might become linked with the National Theatre after the wedding, Hussey became unexpectedly serious about the couple’s future."'That will all end in tears,'she is alleged to have warned.

Prince Harry.On Friday (July 22), William and Kate, Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, released a new photo of their eldest son to mark his ninth birthday.The image shows Prince George grinning from ear to ear, dressed in a blue polo shirt posing on the beach during their holiday in the UK earlier this month.Read more: Camilla is not the ‘racist’ senior royal Sussexes mentioned, claims sourcesThe sheer, unadulterated and natural joy on Prince George's face makes it clear that he's incredibly happy.The same can be said for the images of Princess Charlotte that were released earlier this year to mark her seventh birthday in May.Kate, 40, is into her photography and has been known to have been behind the lens of lots of the family’s official holiday snaps - including the one for George’s birthday.But these traditionally cheeky and smiley birthday photos taken by the former royals go against one of the most harsh criticisms that Harry has hurled at Buckingham Palace.During Harry and Meghan's Oprah Winfrey last year Harry spoke openly about his family and some of his comments shocked the nation.He suggested that to grow up in the confines of the royal family is to essentially suffer. He said he had been “trapped within the system, like the rest of my family are”.Since the explosive interview Harry has painted royal life as a miserable one on more than one occasion.

Blast from the past! The Hallmark Channel is home to heartwarming stories and holiday hits — but do you remember all of the network’s biggest stars over the years?

Camilla is not the “racist” senior royal mentioned by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in their controversial Oprah Winfrey interview, a source has claimed. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex said there were “concerns” over how dark Archie's skin colour would be made by a member of the Royal family in their bombshell interview with Oprah in March 2021 — but would not name the culprit.

A Lanarkshire Army officer received his MBE from HRH Prince Charles at Windsor Castle.

READ MORE: Stacey Solomon transforms her garden to look like Greece for Joe Swash wedding She also explained how arduous the process of changing out her old red hair had been, requiring three days of work as the original colour was first lifted before applying the new shade. It was an all round busy day for the Loose Women star though as she also made two other huge changes in the run up to the wedding, firstly treating herself to some brand new nails, before having to change out her engagement ring.

Palace insiders are hitting back at the claims that Camilla Parker Bowles was the senior member of the royal family who made the racist comments about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s unborn child!

Prince Harry can now take the British government to court over his security arrangements, a judge in London ruled.  When Harry and wife Meghan Markle gave up their status as senior royals and moved to California in 2020, they lost publicly funded U.K. police protection.  The Duke of Sussex now wants to pay for his own police security for when he visits his family in Britain and is challenging the government’s refusal to allow it. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle asked to pay for their own security, and the government denied their request.

Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, is not the 'racist' senior royal, according to palace insiders.Allegations of racism come from Tom Bower's new book “Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors”.But multiple sources have told Page Six, that it is not Camilla who made the alleged comments.READ MORE: Harry and Meghan will ‘find it hard to sustain US life’ after bombshell book - biographerHowever, one highly placed source said: “Camilla is not racist — I can tell you categorically she is not the royal who Harry and Meghan were talking about.”The book says in the early days of Harry and Markle’s romance in 2016, the Duchess of Cornwall — Harry’s stepmother — remarked during one conversation with her stepson about his future grandson's hair being a "ginger afro".The first alleged racism claims during the Sussexes bombshell Oprah interview where they claimed a member of the royal family had asked what skin colour their future child would havePrevious Page Six reports say Harry is not a big fan of his stepmother, but another palace insider said: “Yes, Harry may not love Camilla, but that goes back years — way before he met Meghan and their marriage. And that has nothing to do with any alleged racism.”Insiders told Page Six that the Sussexes are believed to not be reading the book and will not be responding to its claims.The Duchess of Cornwall’ recently celebrated her 75th birthday.The occasion was celebrated on Sunday (July 17) with a small family dinner, Clarence House has said.It is believed that Prince Charles also hosted an evening get-together at Highgrove.Clarence House have been contacted for comment.

Prince Harry is now allowed to take the British government to court over his security arrangements in the U.K., a judge in London ruled Friday.

A night to remember. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s New York City date was one for the books. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex celebrated their first date anniversary in the Big Apple.

Meghan Markle demanded that Prince Harry put out a statement comparing her to his late mother Princess Diana — way back when they had just started dating?! Yet another shocking claim from the bombshell book everyone is talking about.

Yikes…

Meghan Markle reportedly made several changes to her Wikipedia page after she met Prince Harry, it has been claimed. Page 6 reports that in October 2016, Meghan's page was subtly changed to promote her as an “activist” and “humanitarian.”At the time, Prince Harry and Meghan were in the very early days of their relationship and had not yet gone public. READ MORE: Prince Harry wins first stage of legal battle against Home Office over private security According to Wiki changes logs, the first alteration removed the fact she was “the model who held case #24 on the US version of the television game show “Deal or No Deal.”This was changed to gushing praise of Meghan's activism, reading: "Markle is actively involved in the socio-political arena."She has also worked with The United Nations Women, where, as an Advocate, she presented at UN Headquarters for the HeforShe Gender Equality Campaign in September 2014."And these claims have been backed up by Tom Bower in his explosive new book 'Revenge; Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors.'In it, the royal author claims that Meghan personally met with a PR company to oversee the changes to her image.

Express.co.uk about the Spice Girls’ “lovely relationship” with Prince Charles after meeting him several times over the years.The group famously first met the future king 25 years ago and he was left blushing when both Geri Horner (formerly Halliwell) and Mel B kissed him on the cheek.Pushing royal boundaries even further, Geri told Charles that she thought he was “very sexy” and gave him a pat on the bottom.Reflecting on the infamous meeting, Melanie C joked that the group would be “#MeToo’d” for their antics nowadays, although says Charles is able to “chuckle” about it now.She told Express.co.uk: “We have been very, very lucky to meet the Queen and Prince Charles, obviously we have a bit of a history with Prince Charles!“It’s so funny when that old footage pops up of when we first met Charles and he ended up covered in lipstick and having little pats on his bottom. I mean, you know, the girls would get #MeToo’d for that now wouldn’t they!  “But we do have a lovely relationship with Charles.