iOS - Android Planning and building standards manager Tony Finn said that it was "a well-run site" that the council monitor annually and the 36-year extension was considered "appropriate".Councillor Shearer said: "I have got one concern which is the 36 year extension.
Would it be more appropriate to extend it for say 10 years?"That would allow a review of what is going on at the site in 10 years time rather than just having it open ended for 36 years."I do feel that it takes it out of any control whatsoever."There is a sinking feeling at the bottom of my stomach.
This would be better on a shorter timescale.Councillor McLachlan added: "I'm tending to agree with Councillor Shearer. 36 years is a long time and a lot of things could happen.
Read more on dailyrecord.co.uk