When a New York Times opinion piece dropped on Sunday posing the question as to whether Ronan Farrow was “too good to be true,” we — along with many others — wondered if there was another profile of a monster about to come out that folks were trying to pre-empt with bad press.
However, it wasn’t a new story of sexual misconduct that followed but an old one. Matt Lauer clearly saw a window for his own chance at discrediting one of the lead reporters who outed him for alleged sexual misconduct. Related: Woody Allen Says Ronan Could Be Frank Sinatra’s Son On Tuesday he wrote his own op-ed, published in Mediaite, called “Why Ronan Farrow Is Indeed Too Good To Be True.” Yeah… In the very lengthy piece he admits to and apologizes for “having a
Read more on perezhilton.com