Nicholas Hamblin: Last News

Katie Price has had two charges against her, including a speeding charge, dismissed after a string of legal troubles, which saw her recently avoid jail after breaching a restraining order.The two charges were dismissed at Crawley Magistrates’ Court on Monday, as ‘no evidence was offered’.Price, 44, had been charged with one count of exceeding the 60mph speed limit on September 13, 2021, and one count of failing to provide information on January 26 this year.The hearing had previously been listed to take place on Tuesday but was brought forward. Price did not attend court.She is currently on holiday in Thailand with her boyfriend Carl Woods, with the pair recently being spotted enjoying a shopping trip.

Katie Price has avoided jail after admitting breaching a restraining order by sending abusive messages to her ex-husband Kieran Hayler about his fiancée Michelle Penticost.

Katie Price has been handed an 18-month community order at Lewes Crown Court to carry out 170 hours of unpaid work after admitting breaching a restraining order.The reality TV star, 43, was charged with breaching a restraining order after she sent a foul-mouthed message, calling her ex husband Kieran Hayler's fiancée Michelle Penticost a "gutter s**g" in a text to him. Judge Stephen Mooney told Price: “In my judgement, this offence was committed out of anger.The words you used were highly offensive and inflammatory so the breach cannot be considered minor.

Katie Price has been handed an 18 month community order, 170 hours of unpaid work and £1500 in costs after she pleaded guilty to breaching a restraining order against ex-husband Kieran Hayler's fiancée.She has been allowed 28 days to pay the legal costs.The 44-year-old appeared at Lewes Crown Court today (June 24) after pleading guilty in May.READ MORE: Katie Price launches explicit rant as former model arrives at court The former glamour model had been warned after pleading guilty that she was at risk of going to prison.During the hearing, Katie's defence, Nicholas Hamblin said there was "no escape" for people in the public eye, including Ms Price.Mr Hamblin has said Katie's guilty plea is an apology - more specifically, "an apology to Ms Penticost".Judge Mooney said: "It's the first twelve words that are why you are here today."It was imposed for your harassment of Ms Pent.

READ MORE: Katie Price smiles as ex-Page 3 star avoids jail over breaching restraining overNow, Kieran has spoken out just hours after Katie's fate was sealed in Lewes Crown Court, where Michelle revealed in a witness statement she was afraid of Ms Price attacking her.In a statement on behalf of Kieran and Michelle, the couple said: "We are incredibly disappointed with the result of today's court hearing."We feel a custodial sentence would have sent the right message to the public given the seriousness of Miss Price's offending."Katie pleaded guilty to her restraining order after sending Kieran text messages, branding Michelle a "gutter sl*g."She said: "Tell your c****** w***e, piece of s**t, girlfriend not to start on me."She has a restraining order so shouldn't try to antagonise me as she is in breach and I'm sure she doesn't want people knowing that she was having an affair with you behind my back. That gutter s**g."In a statement read in court, Michelle said: "The language used has made me scared.

Katie Price's defence counsel, Nicholas Hamblin, has said the star has "two different personalities", and claimed the star behaves in a completely different way in the public to her "vulnerable" personal personal self during her court hearing today.The reality TV star was handed an 18-month community order at Lewes Crown Court to carry out 170 hours of unpaid work after admitting breaching a restraining order.The 43 year old was charged with breaching a restraining order after she sent a foul-mouthed message, calling her ex husband Kieran Hayler's fiancée Michelle Penticost a "gutter s**g" in a text to him. Judge Stephen Mooney told Price: “In my judgement, this offence was committed out of anger.The words you used were highly offensive and inflammatory so the breach cannot be considered minor.