As reported by the Daily Mail, Judge Clarke said: "I am satisfied that on many occasions it [the shed camera] had a very wide field of view and captured the claimant's personal data as she drove in and out of the car park."She also said that Mr Woodard "sought to actively mislead the claimant about how and whether the cameras operated and what they captured". "I am satisfied that the extent of range to which these devices can capture audio is well beyond the range of video that they capture, and in my view cannot be said to be reasonable for crime prevention," she said.The landmark ruling may cause people to reconsider their use of the cameras and surveillance systems around their homes.In response, Mr Woodard said: "I feel for the tens of.
Read more on dailystar.co.uk