In Robert’s motion, it was noted that “broad scale genuine inclusion cannot be achieved through distortions of biological and relational descriptors” and that “an individual’s right to choose their descriptors and pronouns for personal use must not dehumanise the human race and undermine gender”.Roberts in March concluded his speech to the Senate by asking “Breast milk or chest milk?
Father or non-birthing parent? Mother or gestational parent? My motion has the effect of about preventing this language, and now your proposing use of this language?”Roberts, however, is not alone in his launching of a damaging and hateful petitions.
Read more on starobserver.com.au